Email:

Thursday, September 02, 2010 06:26 pm
2009 Elections
BREAKING NEWS
Top Stories
Entertainment
Sports
Things to Do
Opinion
Letters
Blogs
Video (new)
Photo Gallery
Real Estate
Other News
Business Dir.
About Us
Obituaries
Back Issues
Home
Submit News

Site Search
Survey
Should teachers be able to receive tenure protection?

Yes
No
Not sure



Results
Polls

Votes: 157
Comments: 10

Who's Online
There are currently, 257 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here









 






































 Same-sex marriage passes state Senate committee

Breaking News


By Susan C. Moeller / Senior Reporter

TRENTON (Dec. 8, 2009, 12:40 p.m.) — After a marathon session that stretched from the early afternoon hours until just after 10 p.m. on Monday, Dec. 7, the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee narrowly approved a controversial same-sex marriage bill that extends the definition of marriage in New Jersey to include gay and lesbian couples.

The Freedom of Religion and Equality in Civil Marriage Act will be considered by the full Senate on Dec. 10. If approved there, the Assembly has time to act on the bill before Gov. Jon S. Corzine leaves office. Corzine has promised to support the legislation; Governor-elect Chris Christie has not.

“In this country, we do not afford some people full civil rights and some people partial civil rights,” said Sen. Loretta Weinberg, one of the bill’s sponsors.

“The evidence is clear: Civil unions have not worked,” she continued. “Same sex couples are facing patterns of discrimination.”

In the end, after listening to passionate statements from people on both sides of the issue, seven senators agreed with Weinberg, giving them a victory over six others who remained opposed to legalizing gay marriage.

State Sen. Paul Sarlo, from Wood-Ridge, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, voted no. Instead of redefining marriage, the Legislature should fix problems with the current civil union law, Sarlo indicated.

“I am a practicing Roman Catholic,” Sarlo said. “My faith and my family upbringing teach that a marriage is a holy sacrament between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation.”

Noting that his faith also teaches love and equality, Sarlo affirmed his support for New Jersey’s civil union law. “If there are loopholes and if it’s not working, well then we should fix it,” he said.

During the course of the hearing, Republican Sen. Bill Baroni won acceptance of an amendment to the bill that extends religious freedom protections beyond clergy, to church-affiliated societies and institutions, allowing them to opt out of performing gay marriages or allowing their buildings to be used for the same. The exact text of the amendment was not available at press time.

Opponents of the same-sex legislation suggested during the hearing that the voters be asked to decide the controversial issue directly, via a referendum. But, proponents rejected the idea.

Opponents also suggested that the final days of Corzine’s administration are not appropriate for deciding a hotly debated issue like that of gay marriage.

Weinberg, who ran with Corzine in his failed bid for a second term, responded by affirming Corzine’s “legal” and “moral” authority to institute a same-sex marriage law before he leaves office. In so doing, he will remove the second-class status assigned to gay and lesbian partners by the use of the term “civil union,” Weinberg said. She also rejected the idea that gay marriage is a new issue, saying that the discussion has been going on for seven years.

The Legislature instituted a civil union law in 2006, after the state Supreme Court declared that denying same-sex couples the rights afforded to their heterosexual peers was a violation of the equal protection clause of the New Jersey Constitution.

But, according to the findings of the state’s Civil Union Review Commission, the civil union law has not worked, and must be replaced with full civil marriage rights.

Senator Gerald Cardinale, who voted against the Marriage Equality Act, suggested that the Civil Union Review Commission was biased in its results.

The New Jersey Family Policy Council, which advocates for a traditional definition of marriage, has asked for an ethics investigation into the Commission, alleging that it has “operated like an advocacy group supporting same-sex marriage, rather than a legislative commission,” stated NJFPC Executive Director Len Deo.

With just two days before the Senate is scheduled to vote, neither side is claiming victory.

“I think it’s going to be very, very close,” Deo said, adding that he thinks the legislation can be stopped in the Senate.

“We are working very hard,” said Steven Goldstein, chairman of Garden State Equality. “We are not making predictions.”




 
Related Links
· More about Breaking News
· News by john


Most read story about Breaking News:
The Leader Forum close to selling out! 75 percent filled!


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend Send to a Friend


Associated Topics

Top Stories

"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 17 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

puma on sale (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, December 21 @ 16:01:44 UTC
Puma should make sure the people who make your goods are paid at least a living wage, no matter what other brands choose to do. It is the right and decent thing to do.Cheap puma shoes on sale,discount puma shoes, Free shipping and custom,6-8days to your door!!best quality and lowest price!!Hot Sale Puma Men's Future Cat GT Ferrari,Puma Men's Baylee Future Cat II,Puma Men's Speed Cat,Puma Women's Engine Cat Low,Limited goods,discount price,order it now!!!


[ Reply to This ]


Re: (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 08 @ 19:59:55 UTC
I can't wait for run the individuals out of office who vote for this bill. The lame duck gov is going to "kick the people" one more time before he leaves office by voting for this measure..... These "elected" legistrators don't have the guts to let the people decide on this bill because they know it would lose! Well, come next election, we get to decide who stays and who GOES!


[ Reply to This ]


Re: (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 08 @ 20:02:50 UTC
I have nothing against the gay community, but to allow an equal status with traditional marriage couples should not be allowed. Same sex marriage unions should suffice.....


[ Reply to This ]


Re: WOW (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 09 @ 15:36:13 UTC
2009? and you losers are still dictating who can do what with whom.............shame on all of you. you would be screaming bloody murder if it applied to you. what if someone told you that you couldn't marry the person you love? and stop the bulls**t with adam and steve, it's so old. how exactly does it affect you if someone marries the person they love? take food off your table? stop YOUR civil rights? no, only gay civil rights. but that's ok, right? here's an idea, why don't you all go gay bashing down the village tonight? probably right up your alley.
"tis the season to be hateful"........


[ Reply to This ]


Re: (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, December 11 @ 12:28:35 UTC
I cannot believe The Leader newspaper is actually stating the results of some poll they did that says 95% of the people want gay marriages......what Kool Aid are they drinking???? These people are afraid to let the people of the state vote on it, so they are trying to get the outgoing Corzine to approve it. Let him go... and this bill.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Heterosexuals & Marriage? What a joke! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 09 @ 17:18:41 UTC
How could heterosexuals possibly define marriage? What with so many breakups and divorces in the USA, it should hardly be left up to heterosexuals to even bigin to define marriage. Besides, considering the USA is made up of so many different cultures, with extremely opposing definitions of marriage, how can marriage even be defined? Certainly not at "any one" alter, and certainly not under any one God. There are many religions across the USA, some who even believe having multiple wives can be defined as a marriage. I don't see anyone holding a ballot on them. Marriage has become, by its very downfall here in the USA, a certificate one holds somewhere in an old box at the back of the closet ... along with alot of husbands cowering there. America ... grow up. You've had the gay community living in your houses for centuries. They are your sons and daughters, your postmen, your priests, your politicians, your football coaches, your actors, singers, managers, sportsmen and sportswomen, and even a President or two. It's about time gays were given the same privilages everyone else enjoys. This country will be a free place then. And shame on any minority who opposes the rights of all.


[ Reply to This ]


Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 2.072 Seconds