Email:

Thursday, September 02, 2010 06:46 pm
2009 Elections
BREAKING NEWS
Top Stories
Entertainment
Sports
Things to Do
Opinion
Letters
Blogs
Video (new)
Photo Gallery
Real Estate
Other News
Business Dir.
About Us
Obituaries
Back Issues
Home
Submit News

Site Search
Survey
Should teachers be able to receive tenure protection?

Yes
No
Not sure



Results
Polls

Votes: 159
Comments: 10

Who's Online
There are currently, 244 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


 NA promotes six in police department

Top Stories


 
 Photo by Alexis Tarrazi

By Alexis Tarrazi / Senior Reporter

NORTH ARLINGTON (Nov. 19, 2009) — Decked out in their dress blues, six North Arlington police officers were promoted at the Nov. 12 meeting of the mayor and council.

“I thought these guys have been good workers and they have been looking for promotions for the last five or six years and we couldn’t do it,” Councilman Joseph Bianchi said. “I think they deserve their promotions.”

Stephen Chelstowski and John Hearn were both promoted from lieutenant to captain, while Patrolman Joseph Cappelluti, Detective John Cangelosi, Detective Joseph Prinzo and Patrolman Robert Reilly were all promoted to sergeant.

The council voted unanimously for the promotions, with the exception of Councilman Richard Hughes, who was absent.

A number of reasons led to the decision to promote the officers, including anticipated retirements in the department, a lack of high-ranking officers and a looming deadline when promotion tests would expire.

“It is not a question of being happy with the promotions, it’s a question of doing what is necessary to improve the command structure of the department and saving money for the taxpayers,” stated Steve Tanelli, councilman and police liaison, in an e-mail to The Leader. “These changes allowed us to backfill positions that were vacant or will soon be vacated in the coming year due to retirements.”

Currently, the department has a total of 31 police officers (one is on terminal leave), which breaks down to: one chief,  two captains, three lieutenants, nine sergeants and 15 patrolmen/detectives.

“It is possible the borough could lose 11 officers by January 2011 — but we don’t know until they submit their retirement papers,” Thom Ammirato, borough spokesman, said.

Before the promotions, Ammirato said the department did not have any captains and was lacking in the number of sergeants.

“You have at least one sergeant on duty at all time,” Ammirato said. “If we only have two sergeants and three work cycles, then you have to pay overtime. We needed to cut down on overtime.”

Bianchi also noted that these officers were already working in the higher positions and weren’t getting any extra pay. Additionally, he went on to say that the officers had taken the promotions test and it was set to expire. If the officers weren’t promoted they would have to retake the test.

The raises will not take effect until 2011. The number of years served in the department will determine the pay scale increase for each officer.

“By reaching an agreement with the police officers to defer pay increases for one year, the borough council can fulfill its terminal-leave obligations to the retiring officers as required under the collective-bargaining agreement — without increasing costs to the taxpayers,” Tanelli stated. “The important thing is that we will have a more efficient police department at no expense to the taxpayers.”

Mayor Peter Massa and Council President Albert Granell declined to comment.




 
Related Links
· More about Top Stories
· News by alexis


Most read story about Top Stories:
Pimp arrested; prostitution ring blown open


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend Send to a Friend


Associated Topics

North Arlington

"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 33 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: Christie (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, November 21 @ 13:24:11 UTC
Maybe the new attorney general will look into these promotions and question why a 6 year contract.


[ Reply to This ]


all please stop (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, November 22 @ 23:43:49 UTC
everyone - on all sides - please move on.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Terrible (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, November 21 @ 13:42:59 UTC
Disgraceful!!!!!!! Now I understand why there was a tea party in Boston many years ago.


[ Reply to This ]


12 Sergeants? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, November 19 @ 22:52:39 UTC
Lou Ghione finally got what he wanted.

NA now has 12 sergeants out of 32 men.

The question is why?

What is the rationale behind this?

Why does NA have 32 police officers with nearly 17,000 people and ER over 50? Same with Lyndhurst?

These are the most expensive employees.

As usual Hughes voted yes for the promotions, but he's going to cut taxes too.

Believe that and I have some swamp in the Meadowlands you can build houses on...

Oh I forgot, they already tried that and it was called EnCap!

The cost of government will continue to rise in 2010, 2011 no matter who is in charge.

Rich Hughes wants to be mayor at all costs.

Will he make a promise not to hire his wife as municipal clerk?

Is he looking to fire Wall?

Just what is Kearney & Johnson going to do now that they won?

The answer is nothing.

Taxes will skyrocket in 2010 because they won't have the stones to make the necessary cuts and layoffs that should have happened years ago.

They run as conservatives and govern as liberals. In fact the Democrats in NA are more conservative than the GOP!

What is Johnson going to do next year when his buddy McDermott's budget gets defeated again?

You have complete amateurs in charge and they even know it.

Not a single person on the GOP side has a clue.

Hughes, Bianchi vote with the Dems 99% of the time. What is Kearney going to suggest or even do?

Johnson?

Will he be baiting people and taping the meetings?

What a circus.


[ Reply to This ]


TELL US HOW YOU LOWER TAXES CHRIS JOHNSON? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, November 21 @ 04:26:59 UTC
Here's a simple question:

If Bianchi and Hughes vote for every raise and promotion since becoming council members two years ago, are Johnson & Kearney going to rescind, layoff or furlough anyone to reduce taxes?

Kearney said in this paper he will reduce taxes. Hughes & Bianchi said the very same thing when they ran in 2007.

They lied.

Kearney & Johnson are lying too.

They don't know how to govern. Johnson is absolutley clueless...He knows how to tape conversations, maybe he'll go work for the CIA or the FBI in between cutting lawns....

Maybe you can tape for us the plan to reduce taxes and send it to every house in town.

You won the election.

Now what are you going to do?

The answer is raise taxes.

That's the scam that will be pulled over on the voters with Burns & Hughes pulling the strings for Kearney & Johnson...



[ Reply to This ]


Re: ONE BIG QUESTION ??? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 18 @ 00:20:53 UTC
Why did it take the defeat of Councilman Granell for theses promotions to FINALLY take place?


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Re-take test? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, November 22 @ 01:14:00 UTC
Hey Joe, get your facts straight!!! You did it too late. They already had taken the test! This should have been done before they had to take the test.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Windbag (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 18 @ 04:29:39 UTC
Lord,who spews more BS, Amirato or Tanelli ?


[ Reply to This ]


Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.086 Seconds