Email:

Thursday, September 02, 2010 06:25 pm
2009 Elections
BREAKING NEWS
Top Stories
Entertainment
Sports
Things to Do
Opinion
Letters
Blogs
Video (new)
Photo Gallery
Real Estate
Other News
Business Dir.
About Us
Obituaries
Back Issues
Home
Submit News

Site Search
Survey
Should teachers be able to receive tenure protection?

Yes
No
Not sure



Results
Polls

Votes: 157
Comments: 10

Who's Online
There are currently, 255 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


 Carlstadt school salaries increase

Breaking News


By Alexis Tarrazi / Senior Reporter

CARLSTADT (Dec. 2, 2009, 2:10 p.m.) — Members of the Carlstadt Board of Education recently approved several raises for the school district’s top administrators. In a year when Carlstadt residents have seen their school and municipal taxes spike, the raises have raised concern among some local officials.

School administrators received between 3 and 7.5 percent increases — with 4.8 percent serving as the average increase. Lunchroom/playground aides also received between 3.7 and 4.5 percent increases for the 2008-09 school year and between 4.5 and 11.5 percent increases for the 2009-10 year.

The administrators raises passed with five yes votes and two no votes Tuesday, Nov. 17. Board Trustees Walter Beese, Thomas Cox, Allison Forys, Greg Marafelias and John Ondrof all voted in favor, while Donald Diorio and Hernan Lopez voted against. The same vote break down applied to the lunchroom/playground aides with the exception of Beese abstaining, due to his wife working for the district.

Elaine Stevens and Gene Wojna were absent.

“Although I may not have agreed with all of the numbers, you have to provide compromise at times to come to an agreement,” Ondrof stated in an e-mail to The Leader. “I’m sure that all of the people that are involved from both sides weren’t totally satisfied with the settlement. … If both sides walk away from the negotiation feeling that they could have done better, then it was a successful negotiation. If either side is totally satisfied, then the other side didn’t do their job.”

Looking at the administrators in the district, Superintendent of Schools Stephen Kollinok will go from $140,000 for the 2007-08 school year to $152,500 for the 2009-10 to $160,500 for the 2010-11 year — his average increase is 4.6 percent. Business Administrator Stephen Imperato received the largest uptick with a 7.5 percent increase to bring his previous salary of $107,000 to $115,000.

In October, the board wrapped up a two-year long negotiation process with teachers over their salaries. It ended with an increase in pay that measures up to a 3.7 percent spike for the 2008-09 school year, 4.5 percent increase for the 2009-10 school year and 4.5 percent increase for the 2010-11 school year. The percent increase is inclusive of increments, which are set salary increases.

Cox noted that he was OK with the increases in order to bring the numbers up to par with neighboring school districts. “I thought it was an appropriate amount comparative to neighboring districts,” Cox said. “The majority pretty much agreed it wasn’t too much or overkill.”

Comparing the superintendent’s salary to other Leader towns, Lyndhurst Joseph Abate (who serves as both superintendent and business administrator) receives $186,820; Becton's former top official, James Jencarelli, received approximately $145,000; Rutherford’s Leslie O’Keefe gets approximately $170,000; North Arlington’s Oliver Stringham gets $173,559 and Wood-Ridge’s Elaine Giugliano takes in approximately $159,000.

Although most members were satisfied with the raises, Lopez and Diorio were not.

“I believe in these economic times people are faced with money problems, it is inappropriate to give someone that type of raise,” Lopez said in a phone interview. “To go from 3 to 7 percent is a little too much.”

Diorio, who recently ran for state Assembly, was also adamantly against the raises.

“I’m trying to reset the table of the renegotiation process,” Diorio said after the meeting. “Raises should be based on job performance. … But to have an arbitrary, capricious method of evaluating peoples’ performance, is not fair. Now that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t get increases. But automatic increases are just not what we need today and I don’t think we needed them in the past and certainly not moving forward.”

Both Diorio and Lopez also pointed to the borough council’s budget, which was finalized with a 14-percent municipal increase, Nov. 5. Additionally, the Carlstadt Board of Education hit taxpayers with a $10.7 million 2009-10 school budget in April. The budget increase of 4.8 percent, or $382,617, from last year is .8 percent more than the state-allowed spending cap.

“The town just issued a 14-percent increase and that doesn’t include the school taxes,” Lopez continued. “I don’t want to put more burden on the taxpayers. We are trying to utilize their money intelligently to save them money. … I was elected to be the watchdog of taxes and I will continue to vote no on all those things.”




 
Related Links
· More about Breaking News
· News by alexis


Most read story about Breaking News:
The Leader Forum close to selling out! 75 percent filled!


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend Send to a Friend


Associated Topics

CarlstadtTop Stories

"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 20 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

puma on sale (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, December 21 @ 15:55:38 UTC
Puma should make sure the people who make your goods are paid at least a living wage, no matter what other brands choose to do. It is the right and decent thing to do.Cheap puma shoes on sale,discount puma shoes, Free shipping and custom,6-8days to your door!!best quality and lowest price!!Hot Sale Puma Men's Future Cat GT Ferrari,Puma Men's Baylee Future Cat II,Puma Men's Speed Cat,Puma Women's Engine Cat Low,Limited goods,discount price,order it now!!!


[ Reply to This ]


Re: (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, December 05 @ 15:42:54 UTC
Go to the board meeting on Dec 7,2009 at 7:30pm at the carlstadt school and support Diorio and lopez and complain.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, December 03 @ 03:09:58 UTC
160000+115000=275000

Thats for Super and business admin!

186000 in lyndhurst for someone who does both yea thats on par


[ Reply to This ]


Re: watchdog of tax (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, December 03 @ 18:04:09 UTC
Hernan's comment is actually what is wrong with the majority of board members. They are not suppose to be the watchdog of taxes. Here is the code of ehtics from school boards, i guess they left watchdog of taxes out. maybe that should be 13.

New Jersey School Board Member
Code of Ethics





1. I will uphold and enforce all laws, state board rules and regulations, and court orders pertaining to schools. Desired changes should be brought about only through legal and ethical procedures.
2. I will make decisions in terms of the educational welfare of children and will seek to develop and maintain public schools which meet the individual needs of all children regardless of their ability, race, creed, sex or social standing.
3. I will confine my board action to policymaking, planning and appraisal, and I will help to frame policies and plans only after the board has consulted those who will be affected by them.
4. I will behave toward my fellow board members with the respect due their office-demonstrating courtesy, decorum and fair play at all public meetings and in all public statements.
5. I will refrain from inappropriate conduct in public meetings and in making public statements, refraining from any disparagement of my fellow board members or others on a personal, social, racial or religious basis.
6. I will carry out my responsibility, not to administer the schools, but, together with my fellow board members, to see that they are well run.
7. I will recognize that authority rests with the board of education and will make no personal promises nor take any private action which may compromise the board.
8. I will refuse to surrender my independent judgment to special interest or partisan political groups or to use the schools for personal gain or for the gain of friends.
9. I will hold confidential all matters pertaining to the schools which, if disclosed, would needlessly injure individuals or the schools. But in all other matters, I will provide accurate information and, in concert with my fellow board members, interpret to the staff the aspirations of the community for its schools.
10. I will vote to appoint the best qualified personnel available after consideration of the recommendation of the chief school administrator.
11. I will support and protect school personnel in proper performance of their duties.
12. I will refer all complaints to the chief school administrator and will act on such complaints at public meetings only after failure of an administrative solution.



[ Reply to This ]


Re: (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 02 @ 20:33:41 UTC
Give me a break.Why must we bring them up to other districts.In these times the increases are to high.But now I know why.You have two cops on the Board and they are used to raping us poor people of Carlstadt.Maybe we should send them a message and vote down the budget.


[ Reply to This ]


Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.083 Seconds